Modern CPUs consume many power as a lot as 130W. That power ends up as waste heat. In effect, a modern-day mechanism has the identical of a 50W to 130W incandescent lightbulb burning constantly inside the situation. That analogy undersays the difficulty a lightbulb dissipates its heat from the fairly big surconfront of the bulb. A processor should dissipate the exact same amount of warmth over the much smaller surchallenge location of the processor die, typically about 0.25 square inch. Without an reliable heatsink to attract away this warm, the processor could literally burn itself to a crisp practically instantly.

You are watching: Why is it important to know the weight of a cooler when comparing coolers

Nat an early stage all devices deal with this warm problem by placing a substantial metal heatsink in cshed call through the processor die (or integrated warm spreader) and utilizing a little fan to attract or push air via the heat-sink fins. This tool is referred to as a heat-sink/fan (HSF) or CPU cooler. As the power intake of processors has actually ongoing flourishing, so as well has actually the size and mass of the heatsinks they use. Even the stock coolers packaged with retail-boxed processors nowadays are regularly rather huge and heavy. For instance, Figure 5-6 reflects a stock Intel Pentium 4 CPU cooler on the left and also a Thermalappropriate XP-120 afterindustry CPU cooler on the best, via a pair of AA batteries presented for range.


Figure 5-6: Intel stock CPU cooler (left) and Thermalideal XP-120 CPU cooler, with AA batteries shown for scale

CPU Cooler Plumbing

Those things that look choose pipes on the Thermalbest XP-120 cooler are pipes. Heat pipes, to be precise. Some high-finish CPU coolers, consisting of this design, use warmth pipes to boost cooling effectiveness. Heat pipes run much prefer your refrigerator. The warmth generated by the processor vaporizes a fluid. The resulting gas rises by convection up the warm pipe to the radiator section at the height of the cooler, wbelow it condenses, offering up its warmth to the radiator.

Unchoose stock coolers, some aftermarket coolers including this Thermalideal model do not encompass a bundled fan. That"s bereason such coolers tfinish to be provided by performance-and also silent-PC enthusiasts, who like to select a fan via particular airflow and noise features. This Thermalideal cooler deserve to use a huge (120 mm) fan, which because of its dimension deserve to run relatively gradually (and also silently) while still giving a sufficient volume of air flow to cool the processor efficiently. In reality, bereason of their large surchallenge area and high performance, some high-performance afterindustry coolers, consisting of the XP-120, have the right to cool all yet the fastest, hottest processors without using a CPU fan. The airflow from a situation fan suffices to remove waste warmth from the cooler.


Do not assume that simply bereason a heatsink fits a processor, it is sufficient to cool that processor. Faster processors are physically identical to slower models, however develop more warmth. Heatsinks are rated by processor rate. For example, a heatsink rated for a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 have the right to physically be installed on a 3.8 GHz Pentium 4, but is grossly inadequate to cool it. Nor have the right to you judge exclusively by processor rate. For instance, Intel has actually created 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 processors making use of the earlier, cooler-running Northhardwood core and the later on, hotter-running Prescott-core. A heatsink rated for usage through a 2.8 GHz Northwood-core Pentium 4 is not great enough for a 2.8 GHz Prescott-core Pentium 4. Make sure that the heatsink/fan unit you choose is rated for the particular processor you use it via.

Heatsinks are constructed via various products, according to their prices and also intfinished uses. An inexpensive heatsink, or one intended for usage via a sreduced processor, is likely to be of all-aluminum building. Aluminum is inexpensive and also reasonably effective in transporting heat. Copper is a lot even more expensive than aluminum, yet is additionally much even more efficient in delivering heat. Accordingly, a more expensive heatsink, or one intfinished for a faster processor, can be built mainly of aluminum, yet via copper surdeals with wright here the processor contacts the heatsink. The the majority of expensive heatsinks, and also those intended for use via the fastest processors, are built of pure copper.

Heatsink/fan units likewise differ in the form and also size of fan they use, and also just how quick that fan runs. Fan rate is an worry, bereason all other points being equal, a faster-running fan produces more noise. For equal air circulation, a larger, sreduced fan produces much less noise than a smaller, much faster fan. Fan sizes have actually boosted as processor speeds have actually enhanced, to carry out the high air flow volume required to cool the heatsink while maintaining fan rate (and noise) at a reasonable level. For instance, heatsinks for Pentium II processors used 30 mm fans. Heatsinks for early on Pentium 4 and also Athlon 64 processors typically provided 60 mm or 70 mm fans. Some third-party "performance" heatsinks targeted at overclockers use 80 mm, 92 mm, or 120 mm fans. Some also use multiple fans.

In general, we recommend using the CPU coolers that are bundled via retail-boxed processors. The bundled coolers are mostly midrange in terms of performance and also noise level neither as effective nor as quiet as excellent aftermarket coolers, yet much less costly.

However, if you are came to around PC noise, a third-party CPU cooler is the method to go. You have the right to spfinish anything from about $15 to even more than $100 on a quiet CPU cooler, depending upon the processor you"re making use of and just just how quiet and also efficient you need the cooler to be. Arctic Cooling ( makes numerous models in the $15 to $30 variety that are sensibly quiet and efficient. If you"re willing to spend a little even more, look at Zalman 7000- and 7700-series coolers (, which are in the $30 to $45 range, and are exceptionally quiet and also so efficient that some models have the right to be run fanmuch less (and also therefore totally silent) with some processors. Finally, if only the ideal will certainly perform and you"re willing to pay $60 or even more for a CPU cooler, pick a Thermalappropriate ( design and include one of the fans recommended by Thermalappropriate.

Thermal Compound Is Critical

The best heatsink/fan can not cool a processor effectively unless thermal compound is provided at the processor/heatsink interchallenge. The processor and heatsink base are both level and poliburned, however even as soon as they are pressed right into cshed call, a thin layer of air sepaprices them. Air insulates well, which is the last thing you desire, so thermal compound is used to disarea the air.

When you install a heatsink, and each time you remove and rearea it, usage fresh thermal compound to ensure proper warmth move. Thermal compound is available in the form of viscous thermal "goop" and as phase-readjust thermal pads, which melt as the processor heats up and also solidify as it cools down. Make certain that the thermal compound you usage is apverified by the processor maker. For example, AMD states certain phase-change thermal pads for certain of its processors, and warns that utilizing any kind of various other thermal compound voids the warranty.


We mainly use the thermal compound or phase-readjust medium that is gave via the cooler. (AMD in specific is very particular about which thermal move media are acceptable for its processors.) When we reinstall a cooler, we primarily use Antec Silver Thermal Compound (, which is inexpensive and also as good as or better than anything else we"ve offered.

The Wrong CPU Cooler Can Kill Your Motherboard

Choosing the ideal aftersector HSF is not trivial. Verifying that the cooler is rated for your processor is simply the initially action. Specialty coolers those that carry out high cooling effectiveness or low noise levels, or both are frequently huge and heavy (and expensive).

Size is necessary bereason the room about the processor socket is frequently cluttered via capacitors and also other components that may prevent a large cooler from being seated effectively. More than one device builder has learned to his dismay that a cooler that shows up to fit may upon being clamped dvery own bend, damages, or short out surrounding components. We have actually never understood why many third-party CPU cooler devices don"t administer motherboard compatibility lists ( Zalmale, for one, does). In the absence of such lists, the finest way to stop damaging your motherboard is to verify visually that all components will certainly clear the cooler before you clamp it into place. If it does not fit well, that"s one more great debate for buying from vendors that have great rerotate plans.

Weight is essential bereason Intel and also AMD specify maximum heatsink weights for which the retaining brackets for their various processors are rated. Many type of specialty CPU coolers exceed the maximum allowable weight occasionally by large margins which introduces the ugly possibility of the cooler breaking totally free from its mount and rattling approximately loose inside the instance. This is an concern with any kind of tower system or other PC that mounts the motherboard vertically, and is a certain risk with portable devices, such as LAN party PCs. AMD Socket A systems are especially at risk to this problem, because the cooler clamps to the CPU socket straight rather than to a retaining bracket that is secured to the motherboard.

See more: Nike Air Force 1 Cartoon Air Force 1 Cartoon Custom, Nike Air Force 1

The best solution, if you need to usage such a heavy cooler, is to select one that comes via a practice retaining bracket fairly than relying on the traditional motherboard bracket. It"s additionally a good concept to deliver such systems in a motherboard horizontal orientation to minimize the danger of breakage during transit.