Oklahoma History CenterResearch CenterMuseums and also SitesState Historic Preservation Office PublicationsAbout OHSSupport


Gov. Haskell signing prohibition right into law(10147, Oklahoma Historical Society Photograph Collection, OHS).

You are watching: During prohibition the wets argued for


Disposing of illegal alcohol in Oklahoma City, 1921(13646, Luther Bishop Collection, OHS).


Prior to 1907 statehood, Oklahoma and Indian territories (the Twin Territories) had different liquor plans. Oklahoma Territory (O.T.) laws allowed the sale of alcohol, but in Indian Territory (I.T.) federal regulations prohibited the circulation of intoxicants. For even more than a decade before statehood, the powerful Anti-Saloon Organization (ASL) and also the Woman"s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) forces waged battle versus the legalized sale of liquor in O.T. and also referred to as for stricter enforcement in I.T. As statehood neared, prohibitionists, through Protestant churches as their crucial support, flexed their political muscle to pick Constitutional Convention delegateways that would framework an antiliquor legislation right into the brand-new state"s constitution.

Antiliquor or "dry" proponents likewise won a significant victory once the federal government not just provided for single statehood in the 1906 Oklahoma Enabling Act however also mandated prohibition in I.T. for twenty-one years. The act allowed Oklahoma to create a "dispensary" or liquor firm to take care of the sale of alcohol for "medicinal" objectives.

With an top hand at the Constitutional Convention, prohibition forces wanted to make the entire state "bone dry." They discovered a skillful champion for their cause in Charles N. Haskell, one of the convention leaders and future governor. Although proliquor teams ("wets") such as the Citizens Organization tried to convince the delegateways of the revenue value of liquor sales, they encountered obstacle in counteracting the ASL and WCTU. Wets faced a stiff challenge in overcoming the organized project of drys in the areas and also the strong antisaloon sentiment spanalysis throughout the country in the time of the late nineteenth and at an early stage twentieth centuries.

On September 17, 1907, future Oklahomans accepted prohibition as component of the new state"s constitution. Drys accomplished their prompt objective, and also they made repeal of prohibition more challenging for subsequent generations to overrotate by writing prohibition into basic regulation. Upon taking office, Charles N. Haskell, the state"s first governor, reiterated his assistance for strong enforcement, and he put on alert anyone ""within our borders disposed to violate ."" Subsequent Oklahoma governors would certainly make equivalent statements, yet they would accomplish no much better enforcement document than Oklahoma"s initially chief executive.

Between statehood and also the 1930s Oklahoma"s rural, Protestant landscape provided a healthy and balanced environment for prohibition as a social experiment. The Billups Law, passed in March 1908, offered for a dispensary device, and also a couple of Oklahomans came to be "ill" enough to request "prescription" medicine from the dispensary. Governor Haskell strongly defended this outlet for liquor. It was not a ""barrel of whisessential through the head knocked in and a tin cup hanging conveniently near."" In spite of the governor"s defense and assistance of the ASL, the dispensary system fell upon tough times, victim to financial failure, corruption, and the availcapability of bootleg liquor. In November 1908 Oklahomans voted to abolish the dispensary, yet a court decision overturned that vote on a technicality. However, the state recognized the fenergy of the dispensary as a moneymaking scheme, and in 1911 Oklahoma lawmachines passed regulation that properly eliminated the institution. However before, the few drinkers who had actually relied on the dispensary might quickly secure their "medicine" through illegal implies.

World War I and also the reliable lobbying of antiliquor teams carried favorable results in Oklahoma and also many other claims. With much of the nation currently in the dry column by 1915, the ASL wanted to provide a knockout punch to alcohol wherever it flowed. Oklahoma drys joined behind this effort. In December 1917 Congress submitted a constitutional amendment to outregulation the sale of liquor throughout the USA. Oklahoma, through just eight dissenting votes in the legislature, ended up being the eighteenth state to ratify the Eighteenth Amendment in January 1919. With the assist of a number of social and also political forces, drys had now completed their ultimate objective of nationwide prohibition. Nevertheless, federal enforcement officials proficient challenge policing the nation"s expansive boundaries, and in Oklahoma the amendment did bit to encourage stronger enforcement of the legislation.

Disrespect for the liquor legislation during the 1920s sustained the wets" continued agitation for overthrowing state laws and also the Eighteenth Amendment. With the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt, that favored repeal, an Association Against the Prohibition Amendment successfully pressured Congress to grant a resolution that referred to as for state conventions to repeal the Eighteenth Amendment. Before Oklahoma can establish a convention process for repeal, in December 1933 Utah became the thirty-sixth state to ratify the Twenty-initially Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ending prohibition. Although Oklahoma was not prepared to abandon the state"s dry history, plainly attitudes toward liquor law had started to shift.

Obvious indications of change in Oklahoma came in 1933 through a proposal to approve the sale of beer. Wets argued that beer stood for a possibility to achieve badly essential revenue for a state hard hit by the Great Depression. More than thirty states had currently approved the sale of beer automatically following repeal, and Oklahoma probeer forces made the many of that reality. They sassist citizens need to have actually the possibility to vote on the issue in a referendum. Led by a team calling itself the Beer for Oklahoma League, the legislature approved a beer referendum in summer 1933. Discounting the wets" emphasis on revenue and individual liberty, the Prohibition Thousand company fought tough to rotate earlier "suds," arguing that beer would intend even more crime and even more jails. Drys thought in their message, but Oklahomans thought even more in beer and also its revenue. The referendum lugged by a margin of even more than ninety-5 thousand also votes, through just twenty of Oklahoma"s seventy-salso counties in the dry column. However, if wets believed that Oklahomans would now welcome tough liquor in the state, they were badly mistaken. More than two decades would certainly pass prior to Oklahomans aboliburned the constitutional manday versus liquor.

Throughout the 1940s drys combated off established attempts to legalize liquor, but they faicaused acquire state regulation to outlaw beer or, at the leastern, to limit it to package sales. With the support of Gov. Raymond Gary, in 1957 the United Drys, an umbrella organization for the antibeer groups, initiated a local-option amendment designed to limit the circulation and also sale of beer. After significant court haggling over the validity of the dry project, the state apshowed a referendum on the issue. Aobtain, the wets pressed residence the worth of beer revenue to the state, and they continuously stressed that outlawing beer in the miscellaneous Oklahoma counties would certainly result in more bootlegging. Governor Gary endeavored to defeat the wet debate with his very own statistics, however he and his supporters fairesulted in convince Oklahomans. When they marched to the polls in December 1957, they administered regional option a resounding defeat, through forty-three of seventy-salso counties versus it. Significantly, all yet four Oklahoma cities via a populace of ten thousand or even more voted versus local alternative.

The defeat of local option represented the beginning of the end for prohibition in Oklahoma. A change in attitude among Oklahomans had actually progressively occurred in addition to boosted industrialism, more commercial activity, and also metropolitan development. Certainly, by mid-twentieth century, the Sooner State was even more than 50 percent urban. Also, a much more youthful and also courageous state political leadership had actually arised to dispute some long-standing social legacies. In 1958 Democrat J. Howard Edmondson won the governorship, committing himself to solid enforcement of the regulations and to a one-of-a-kind election on repeal. Although Edmondchild confronted established opplace in pushing a repeal referendum with the legislature, he ultimately flourished, and a vote was set for April 1959. The referendum provided for the package sale of liquor, and it likewise had a regional choice provision.

See more: Joyce Meyer Sermons Battlefield Of The Mind, Battlefield Of The Mind

Edmondkid lived approximately his promise of vigorous enforcement of the liquor laws. He wanted to offer Sooners the choice of voting for legalized liquor or doing without the illegal booze that so many kind of of them continued to imbibe. Commissioner of Public Safety Joe Cannon devised an enforcement technique to shut off almost all liquor supplies to the state. Drys hated to admit it, however the enforcement they had long demanded operated versus them. The so-referred to as "Cannon raids" affected convention and also hotel service in the bigger cities, and also they annoyed some human being unaccustomed to searcs of establishments that offered booze. A United Oklahomans team that led the attack against the repeal referendum confronted a number of problems they could not conquer. They uncovered it challenging to raise money equal to that elevated by the wet pressures, and the churches that had actually continual the drys in the previous had actually split over the problem. The contention that liquor would certainly bring significant brand-new profits to the state decisively influenced voters in the time of the repeal controversy, as some citizens believed that liquor sales would help protect against brand-new taxes.

On April 7, 1959, Oklahomans visited the polls and also contradicted Will Rogers"s adage that they would vote "dry as lengthy as they might stagger to the polls." They repealed prohibition and turned back neighborhood choice. The Liquor Control Act established an Alcohol Control Board (renamed the Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission in 1985) that governed the manufacture and also sale of alcohol. The legislation did not permit liquor by the drink, and that certain provision remained law until 1984 once the state voted it out. Prohibitionists continued to lament the passing of the old order, however as Oklahoma neared its centennial, few indications pointed to a go back to the previous.

Jimmie L. Franklin